English - United Kingdom
DMARC enforcement

Spoofing & Brand Abuse

  • Your domain can be spoofed: Without DMARC enforcement, attackers can send emails that look as if they come from your domain.
  • Customers lose trust: Phishing attempts using your brand damage credibility and increase the support workload.
  • No protection layer: p=none only monitors – it does not ask receivers to block unauthenticated mail.

Deliverability & Inbox Placement

  • Lower inbox placement: Google and Yahoo have set stricter authentication requirements; proper set-up supports more reliable delivery.
  • Silent reputation decay: Authentication problems and domain abuse can weaken sender reputation over time.
  • Marketing ROI drops: When fewer emails reach the inbox, engagement and conversions fall.

Loss of BIMI & Verified Identity

  • No verified logo in inboxes: BIMI requires DMARC enforcement – without it, your brand cannot get this visual signal.
  • Weaker brand differentiation: Competitors with BIMI stand out visually in Gmail, Apple Mail and Yahoo.
  • Missed trust signals: Verified logos can increase open rates and user confidence.

Compliance & Security Risk

  • Failing security assessments: More vendors and enterprises expect DMARC enforcement in procurement.
  • Higher compliance exposure: Spoofing incidents can trigger compliance issues in regulated industries.
  • Weak supply-chain security: Unprotected domains are increasingly considered a risk factor.

Operational & Financial Impact

  • More time spent on incidents: Without enforcement, your organisation is more exposed to phishing and spoofing.
  • Costly remediation: Recovering domain reputation or cleaning up after attacks can be far more expensive than prevention.
  • Falling behind competitors: DMARC enforcement is becoming a baseline – not having it can signal outdated security.

Need help optimising your DMARC record for BIMI?

Contact our experts for guidance on email authentication and brand protection!